The Confluence
Winter 2001
Doolittle Seeks to Shut Down Commercial Rafting
In a move widely perceived as political payback
for the rafting community's opposition to his Auburn dam efforts,
John Doolittle has succeeded in inserting language in the 2001
Energy and Water Appropriations bill aimed at shutting down commercial
rafting on the North and Middle Forks of the American River. Doolittle's
language prohibits the Bureau of Reclamation from making federal
funds available for issuance of permits for commercial rafting
activities within Auburn State Recreation Area until a new analysis
of the environmental impacts of those activities is completed,
a process that could take years.
Doolittle claims his effort to stop commercial
rafting on these rivers is motivated by his concern that the rafting
industry may be causing damage to the river canyons. This, of
course, is rubbish. Doolittle's dream is to flood up to 48 miles
of these very same river canyons he claims to be interested in
preserving "in as pristine a state as possible," as
he told the Sacramento Bee in a June 20, 2001, article. The hypocrisy
of Doolittle's public pronouncements is underscored by the complete
lack of evidence that rafting is having a negative impact on the
canyon environment, an assessment State Parks agrees with.
Fortunately, Doolittle's legislation is unlikely to have its desired
effect. The bill restricts access to federal funds only; since
State Parks collects fees as part of its commercial rafting permit
program, those fees should be sufficient to sustain the program
despite Doolittle's best efforts to the contrary.
Folsom Dam Raise Bill Introduced
The effort to boost Sacramento's level of flood
protection has received a big boost with the recent introduction
of legislation by Representative Robert Matsui and Senator Barbara
Boxer to raise the height of Folsom Dam by 7 feet. The added flood
storage capacity made possible by the dam raise, in conjunction
with other flood control improvements already underway, will allow
Sacramento to achieve its long-sought goal of 200 year flood protection.
The legislation contemplates using the added storage capacity
for flood control purposes only, meaning it will not be used for
dry season water storage that would flood the lower reaches of
the North and South Forks of the American River. For this reason,
and because the legislation also calls for significant wildlife
and salmon habitat restoration downstream of Folsom, the bill
has won the endorsement of Friends of the River.
Rep. Matsui's bill not only represents a cost-effective, environmentally
friendly means of meeting Sacramento's flood protection needs;
it also greatly weakens the argument that construction of an Auburn
dam is necessary for flood control reasons.
Not surprisingly, Congressman John Doolittle opposes the measure
and will no doubt use his position on the House Energy and Water
Appropriations Committee to try to sabotage it. Fortunately, Doolittle
is alone in his opposition to Matsui's bill among Sacramento-area
members of Congress, and the proposal enjoys widespread support
in Sacramento. It is therefore doubtful Doolittle will succeed
in his efforts to block approval of this sensible solution to
flood threats on the lower American River.