The Confluence page 2

Action Alert: Restore the River to Its Historic Channel

(Continued from page 1)
Auburn’s American River Canyon can and should play a vital role in satisfying that demand.  Indeed, we feel this canyon, because of its accessibility and natural beauty, could be the crown jewel of the recreational mecca Placer County is now becoming.
   One vital step to realizing this dream involves restoring the river to its natural streambed at the site of the former Auburn Dam construction project.  As part of the initial phase of the dam project, which began over thirty years ago, the river was diverted through a tunnel at the dam site, leaving a 3/4 mile stretch of river bed in a dry or “dewatered” state. Because of the construction activity and safety hazards associated with the bypass tunnel, the United States Bureau of Reclamation imposed a ban on all forms of recreational boating from the confluence to the dam site.  This ban has remained in place to this day, despite the fact that dam construction was halted 22 years ago.
   PARC believes the time has come to close the bypass tunnel, put the river back in its natural channel, and let the public use the river again.  Three times this decade Congressman John Doolittle has attempted to persuade Congress to authorize the resumption of Auburn Dam construction and three times Congress has responded with an emphatic “no.”  What PARC is proposing would not preclude future construction of a dam at Auburn, should Congress at some point see fit to appropriate funds for that purpose.  We simply are saying that unless and until that occurs, the public should have the right to fully enjoy these public lands and this public river.
   This summer we have a golden opportunity to advance that goal.  The Bureau of Reclamation is planning to construct a permanent pump station for the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) in the American River Canyon near the dam site.  One option for consideration would close the bypass tunnel, restore the river and open the river back up to public use.  The Bureau and PCWA at one time favored this plan, given its obvious recreational and environmental benefits as well as its superior appeal from both public safety and engineering standpoints.  Unfortunately, John Doolittle strenuously opposes the proposal, apparently because he fears opening up the river to public recreation will serve as a death knell for his beloved Auburn Dam.  Under great pressure from Congressman Doolittle, the Bureau and PCWA are now favoring an alternative design proposal that will not close the tunnel, restore the river, or open the river to public use.
   The Bureau is currently soliciting views of all interested parties regarding the scope and content of environmental information that should be included in the environmental impact statement the Bureau and PCWA are preparing.  PARC believes the tunnel closure/river restoration plan, known as the “mid-channel” alternative, has clearly superior environmental and recreational benefits.  We encourage interested citizens to submit written comments to Rod Hall, Environmental Specialist, Bureau of Reclamation, 7794 Folsom Dam Road, Folsom, CA 95630-1799.  The deadline for submitting comments is July 30, 1999.  Please use the insert page titled “Comment Card.”
   Your comments are needed now.  
POINTS TO ADDRESS IN YOUR COMMENTS:
  1. The diversion tunnel constitutes a serious public safety hazard and should be closed.
  2. The current “closed” status of this stretch of the river deprives the public of incredible recreational opportunities and is a violation of California’s Public Trust  Doctrine, which guarantees the public  the right to use public waterways
  3. The proposed “upstream diversion” (Doolittle’s plan) perpetuates ongoing environmental harm to the river ecosystem that can no longer be justified as a necessary consequence of dam construction.
  4. The proposed “upstream diversion” plan provides only the single benefit of allowing PCWA to access American River water.
  5. The “mid-channel” (community plan) is the most cost-effective plan since it eliminates a public safety hazard, restores the river eco-system and restores the public’s right to use the river for recreational purposes.
  6. How will diverting up to 35,000 acre feet of water affect fall and winter Chinook salmon and steelhead runs on the lower American River?


  7.            
       Previous Page